I appreciate so much your idea of sharing well-crafted knowledge for free here. I am working on a project of self experiment that encourage our nature curiosity ( and with quantified observation ). So when I saw your experiment success and been told here, that’s such a wonderful ! Thank you
Thank you Michael! This is a very immersive tool for fact checking. Could you please share what you think the best classroom practice would be? Or share how teachers are using it to teach critical thiniking to their students?
This is fantastic! And I would happily support it/you financially. However, I can't commit to a yearly payment. Can you make a one-off option available?
Mike--This is fantastic! Our team is going to try to adapt it as part of our genai writing tool and see if it is able to identify claims and evidence in student writing and scaffold better writing. Will definitely credit you!!
This is amazing; I'm excited to try it. Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI should recruit you. Or a government initiative to protect information integrity and literacy (I can dream, no?).
So it can't be turned into a custom GPT or a Poe bot right now because the instructions are too long?
I tried it on Claude 3.7 Sonnet free version and it worked with a text based question. It gave me an error message when I pasted a picture in. The results from the text based question were excellent. Thank you for creating this query and sharing it.
I'm actively looking for disinformation. This is fantastic! Thank you for sharing it.
One idea for iteration: generate something easy to share in situ, so that specific instances can be corrected or redirected (not your specific goal, but the research showing redirection > refutation weighs heavily on me)?
Oh the little paragraph in the end should be close to that, but let me think about how to make it more clear that last part is supposed to be the little "tear-off tag" of the analysis. I meant that part to be something that could be pasted into a comment.
I appreciate so much your idea of sharing well-crafted knowledge for free here. I am working on a project of self experiment that encourage our nature curiosity ( and with quantified observation ). So when I saw your experiment success and been told here, that’s such a wonderful ! Thank you
Thank you Michael! This is a very immersive tool for fact checking. Could you please share what you think the best classroom practice would be? Or share how teachers are using it to teach critical thiniking to their students?
This is fantastic! And I would happily support it/you financially. However, I can't commit to a yearly payment. Can you make a one-off option available?
This is awesome, Mike. I saw your most recently updated version and I can't wait to use this with my Independent Research class next year.
Mike--This is fantastic! Our team is going to try to adapt it as part of our genai writing tool and see if it is able to identify claims and evidence in student writing and scaffold better writing. Will definitely credit you!!
Happy International Fact-Checking Day, Mike!
This is amazing; I'm excited to try it. Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI should recruit you. Or a government initiative to protect information integrity and literacy (I can dream, no?).
So it can't be turned into a custom GPT or a Poe bot right now because the instructions are too long?
I tried it on Claude 3.7 Sonnet free version and it worked with a text based question. It gave me an error message when I pasted a picture in. The results from the text based question were excellent. Thank you for creating this query and sharing it.
https://chatgpt.com/g/g-67eb64051ee081919f09de7acac90871-fact-checking-and-contextual-analysis
I think it may benefit if you will mention by name and force LLM to perform formal Toulmin argument analysis on user input
I used it for few things and its great! Thank you!
I copied your prompt into custom chat gpt.
I'm actively looking for disinformation. This is fantastic! Thank you for sharing it.
One idea for iteration: generate something easy to share in situ, so that specific instances can be corrected or redirected (not your specific goal, but the research showing redirection > refutation weighs heavily on me)?
Oh the little paragraph in the end should be close to that, but let me think about how to make it more clear that last part is supposed to be the little "tear-off tag" of the analysis. I meant that part to be something that could be pasted into a comment.